|
Two
bastions of democracy, the United Nations and the United States
of America, are both concerned about the extra-judicial killings
of militants, agrarian leaders and media men (830) in the
Philippines. This country is supposed to be the Citadel of
Christianity in the Far East and a vibrant democracy in Asia
that Washington used to be proud of.
Meantime,
the International Press Institute (representing media as the
fourth pillar of democracy) classified the Philippines as
the second most dangerous country for journalists in the world,
next to war-torn Iraq. It was set to recently edit a documentary
on media killings in the Philippines.
The
uniform findings of these three objective and internationally
influential groups establish the fact that there is something
awfully wrong here. They can't possibly be three blind men
leading each other to drown in the river.
The
United Nations, of which the Philippines is a member-nation,
attempts to put order into member countries whose governments
are perceived to violate certain internationally accepted
norms of conduct and sovereign behavior.
The
United Nations thus sent Australian lawyer Philip Alston,
official UN Rapporteur (for many years) for human rights and
international organizations to look into the frightening number
of "unexplained killings" in the country. That obviously
merited the concerned attention of UN who sent its main man
(Alston) (a law and economics expert) who taught Law in prestigious
schools in Europe, Australia and the United States, including
Harvard University. Alston has a doctorate in law from the
University of California Berkeley Law School.
His
credentials in his field is therefore impeccable and Alston
is not "just a muchaco" of the UN who cannot speak
in behalf of his institution as our pathetic justice secretary
Raul Gonzales, in another excess of his diarrhea of the mouth,
had ridiculed him to be.
We
wonder if the honorable secretary of justice would have enough
credentials to be a research mate in that venerable Government
of Governments called the United Nations.
Nations
who are part of the UN Human Rights Counsel, Alston had recommended
the release of the report of the Melo Commission (a body created
by GMA to investigate these killings) and for GMA to make
sure those involved are prosecuted and the killings do not
go unabated.
The
Melo Report, that has been under wraps for some time now,
stated that although the killings (attributed to the military)
is not a matter of State Policy, there is circumstantial (rather
than direct) evidence to link some rogue members of the military
of the murderous activities. There is a direct pointing to
the State to take responsibility for the resolution of the
unexplained killings - regardless of who engineered them.
On
the other hand, the US Ambassador to the Philippines Kristie
Kenney represents a nation who believes "the issue of
human rights is critical in every country." Kenney expressed
concern over the killings and enjoined government to prosecute
those involved in these activities that have given the country
a sore black eye abroad.
The
report had singled out retired general Jovito Palparan and
some "bad eggs" in the military to be suspects in
the trade. Palparan had many times dismissed as sad but inevitable
the "civilian collateral damage" in the anti-insurgency
war.
A
similar voice was echoed by Martial Law implementor Senator
Juan Ponce Enrile who decried that those international bodies
investigating human rights have not experienced "what
it takes to run an anti-insurgency campaign." Nations,
however, are expected to observe international standards of
justice and respect for human rights, if they are to belong
as faithful members of a collegial body like the United Nations.
The
AFP had ducked the issue by saying that the Alston Report
is done in a "state of denial" over the purge killings
done by the NPAs on their enemies as well. That appear like
begging the question because the UN is concerned over behavior
of governments and government should put those who take the
law into their hands by the ways of democracy, by the manner
of lawfulness. To preserve democracy, governments must practice
it.
Moreover,
the existence of NPA purges does no invalidate the criminal
aspect done on Filipinos by the rogue military group responsible
for unexplained killings.
We
sincerely urge the president on "act on these killings"
not just because of the harmful propaganda effect it does
no the electorate's decision making but the fact that ultimately,
"the buck stops at the President's Office in Malacañang."
She may not immediately pay its consequences in the short
term - but there are international arbiters of law whose hands
can become elongated long after a president's wake or term
of office.
The
Estate of Marcos had to pay millions of pesos to thousands
of human right victims of Martial Law - twenty years after
the Dictator fled the EDSA 1986 Revolt. The ruling of American
jurisprudence was upheld by the precedent ruling on General
Tomoyuki Yamashita of Japan who was convicted - not for giving
direct orders - but for not trying to stop or solve the human
rights violations during his wake - when he clearly had the
power to do so.
German
soldier criminals were convicted and lately Saddam Hussein
was hanged for violations of internationally accepted rules
of conduct on human rights - in peace and war.
GMA
has everything to lose by sitting idly by while the killings
grow in numbers. It is abundantly clear that failure to address
these issues will drive away investors away from a country
to be dubbed as "Asia's Wild Wild West." Likewise
democratic nation-donors of the country will likely withhold
donation and aid for a country that thrives on the scattered
graves of its citizens. In the end, the victims will also
organize their own "vigilance" units and retaliate
in the same violent kind. It is only as matter of time that
a full blown "war of revenge" will be waged.
It
is going to cost this country - politically and economically.
It would be totally destabilizing for the Arroyo Regime.
GMA,
to her credit (and perhaps knowing what is good and bad for
her) has ordered the Melo Commission report released, gave
P25-Million to the Commission on Human Rights to further the
investigation of the killings, ordered the Supreme Court to
set up special courts to expedite related cases, asked the
DOJ to improve the Witness Protection Plan and the prodded
AFP/DND to update her on the issue of "command responsibility."
With
local and international pressure pressing GMA like two flanks
of tanks.
Be
it that other peoples' heads roll, rather than hers.
That's
a case for pragmatic political survival.
|