Send Money to the Philippines
VOL. LIII No. 035
City of Tagbilaran, Bohol, Philippines
Sunday, September 16, 2007

ADVERTISERS
Jala, Petalcorin deny
  cheating in May polls
Bohol solons "not
  informed" of probe
  by Congress on effects
  of seismic survey
Sec. Atienza warns DENR
  on corruption
Bohol Light franchise is
  illegal, Lim claims
OPINION
Obiter Dictum
Juan L. Mercado
Sundry
Fr. Roy Cimagala
One Voice
LINKS
 
 

Bohol Light franchise
is illegal, Lim claims
By KIT BAGAIPO

   
 

ONE-ON-ONE. Former OIC Gov. Victor de la Serna (second from left) and City Mayor Dan Lim (extreme right) talk on their stand regarding the operations of the Bohol Light and Water companies as interviewed by DYRD Alagad anchormen Chito Visarra and Jerry Pabe last Wednesday
 

The franchise of Bohol Light Company Incorporated is "highly questionable and illegal."
This was the claim made by City Mayor Dan Lim yesterday who renewed his call for Gov. Erico Aumentado to pursue the reacquisition of the Salcon controlled power and water utilities.

Lim's statement followed after the mayor was accused by former OIC Gov. Victor dela Serna to have been "silenced" together with the governor regarding the provincial government's bid to buy-back the 70% equity of Salcon in Bohol Light and Bohol Water.

Lim retorted yesterday during his weekly "Mayor's Report" saying that expropriation, as proposed by Dela Serna is a risky option that could drive away investors here.

The mayor said that Bohol Light's franchise can be nullified in court. In fact, Salcon wants to totally eliminate the provincial government's legal personality in the company by applying a franchise for Bohol Light in Congress.

   

The National Electrification Administration (NEA) did not have authority to issue franchise upon adoption of the EPIRA law, Lim said, as NEA approved Bohol Light's franchise two years after the Electric Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA).

Under the EPIRA law only Congress could issue a franchise to power distribution companies.

"If their franchise is valid and legal, then why is the company applying for a franchise in Congress?" Lim asked.

"[It's] highly questionable that the NEA still accommodated the Bohol Light application despite the adoption of EPIRA," the mayor added.

Lim challenged the governor and the provincial board to exploit this argument to invalidate the power utility's franchise.

Even Dela Serna, according to Lim, as member of the Bohol Light board should question this through a court petition.

POWER HIKE

Bohol Light will allegedly earn more than P70-million every year due to the 25-centavo power rate increase granted by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC), Lim said.

This will mean an average of an additional expense of P3,000 monthly to an average consumer, according to the mayor.

It may be recalled that there is a pending petition filed by the mayor against the water rate increase of Bohol Water at the RTC.

Bohol Water was supposed to implement a 40% water rate hike but was issued an injunction resulting from Lim's petition.

The mayor said he has no personality to initiate an offer to Salcon in reacquiring the power and water utilities.

Lim said he could only question the transfer of reservoirs owned by the city to Bohol Water during the time of former mayor Jose Torralba.

GROUNDS FOR JVA ANNULMENT

RTC Judge Dionisio Calibo, interacting over the mayor's radio program, said it is incumbent upon the present provincial board to review what the previous Sangguniang Panlalawigan's approval of the joint venture agreement between Salcon and the provincial government.

Calibo disclosed that some of the former board members who signed the contract even admitted that they have not read the entire provisions of the JVA.

The contract for the JVA "was not an ordinance authorizing the governor to sell the assets of the former Provincial Public Utilities Department (PPUD), but to enter into a JVA," Calibo pointed out.

The members of the board did not even know that the assets of the PPUD will be sold when it was supposed to represent as the 30% ownership of the province in the joint venture, Calibo claimed.

However, "these were sold in violation of the joint venture concept," he added suggesting that the present provincial board should not only file for an injunction but an annulment of contract with preliminary injunction.

Salcon has violated the provisions of the joint venture proposal, according to Calibo.
"The 30% should represent assets and not the free equity as stipulated in the JVA contract," he said.

In fact, Calibo explained that former Chief Justice Panganiban had a treatise regarding joint ventures which stipulates that there must be transparency. However, until now stockholders of Bohol Water and Bohol Light have not been revealed to the public, he said.

Furthermore, in joint ventures there should be fair sharing of revenues which is not fulfilled in the case of Salcon and the provincial government.

In fact, Calibo stressed, the sale of assets of the former PPUD is a ground for annulment of the JVA.

For Comments: email to bingo_dejaresco@boholchronicle.com Or editor@boholchronicle.com

 
Web www.BoholChronicle.com
© Copyright Bohol Chronicle | 2002-2007 | All Rights Reserved | =design by : woah=
UPDATED BI-WEEKLY

 

Click here for Revious IssuesAbout BoholChronicle.comContact Us