|
At
the moment, we have a raging controversy over our rice supply.
Different, occasionally enlightening views are aired. As a
result we get to know more about the intricate business of
our rice and food supply.
This,
I think, is good for all of us. It's part of our continuing
education about our social and political life. Discussions
like this facilitate our sense of solidarity as a people.
Let's try to keep it that way.
My
prayer is that the discussion be kept at the high level of
dialogue, especially in terms of range, content and quality.
As much as possible, we should avoid partisan politicking,
which usually distorts the issue, dragging it to the gutter.
The
media should be particularly sensitive to this need. People
are already developing a keen sense of discerning what truly
has a bearing on the matter and what is extraneous to it,
what is spin and what is reality.
They
now can easily distinguish between chaff and grain. They can
smell a rat from a distance, seeing through the hidden agendas
and ulterior motives. More importantly, they know who they
are.
Those
who have something to say about the issue should purify their
intention, and organize and express their position well. They
should intervene for the sole purpose of helping solve the
problem, and not just to score "pogi" points.
Thus,
they should study their opinions thoroughly, verifying their
data, checking their theories and hypotheses, and being open
to other views. They should always be courteous and cordial
in the discussion.
In
short, please, let's do away with reckless commentaries and
shooting from the hip. Let's tone down our emotions and inflammatory
language. Let's hear all sides calmly.
Politicians
and media people should submit themselves to a high standard
of discretion and sobriety when expressing their views. They
should avoid sowing intrigues and witch-hunting.
There
obviously can be persons, offices, social practices, etc.
that can be blamed for something. Let's go easy on this, refusing
to get stuck there. We should always be constructive in our
approach, convinced that solving problems is more important
and urgent than blaming some people.
That's
why it saddened me to note that in all this exciting discussion
about the rice issue, a nasty topic was made to cash in on
it. I'm referring to the attempt to link our rice problem
with our supposed overpopulation.
It's
true that everyone is free to bring out anything for all of
us to consider and discuss. It's just that with all our exchanges
through the years, we should already know what are the real
issues and what are mere myths.
Blaming
our population level for our rice shortage is painfully an
uncalled for, anachronistic tearing of one's hair. Like, hello,
this kind of thinking has been debunked ages ago.
This
is the classic Malthusian fear whose proper place is the museum
or the history books of fascinating but failed theories and
fallacies. Are we to be told again that we should have a so-called
optimum family size, say, of two or four children only?
And
that to achieve this population level, we can use any means,
mouthing again the mantra of freedom of choice that justifies
the use of clearly immoral means of family planning and population
control?
This
is what the persistent advocates of population-control-at-all-costs
are still doing.
In
our Congress today, there are pending bills meant to legalize
immoral means of family planning, sugar-coating them as part
of reproductive health.
The
sponsors of these bills, who have no qualms both in presenting
themselves as devout Catholics and in violating Church teachings,
even have the gall to pontificate on what is now the moral
way to tackle our supposed population problem.
Everyone
knows that there are problems everywhere-food, water, air,
our politics, etc. With respect to our food problem, only
ideological crackpots believe it's a problem without solution,
or that the world is running out of resources to feed us.
We
will always find solutions, and solutions are fit for us,
who are not just economic entities, or purely material or
social beings. That There are solutions that are fit for us
who are persons and children of God.
(E-mail:
juan_mercado@boholchronicle.com)
|