
TRABAJO,
BUDIONGAN
|
|
Ombudsman
Merceditas Gutierrez has ordered the filing of graft
charges against an incumbent provincial board member
and a former mayor at the Sandiganbayan.
Gutierrez
approved the ruling of the Ombudsman-Visayas Graft Investigation
and Prosecution Office which found prima facie evidence
against Board Member Josil Trabajo and former Carmen
Mayor Pedro Budiongan in violation of the Anti-Graft
and Corrupt Practices Act.
|
The
case stemmed from a complaint filed by Valeriano Nadala Sr.,
a resident of Poblacion Norte, Carmen, accusing Budiongan
and Trabajo, then the vice mayor, of conniving to implement
a road improvement project "with their common purpose
of having a financial interest in the project."
On
March 2003, Budiongan and Trabajo, as municipal mayor and
vice mayor, approved road improvement projects in barangays
Vallehermoso-Montehermoso and Luan-La Salvacion Roads in Carmen.
|
|
|
The
respondents were also the suppliers of the project,
by way of selling 501 loads of limestone (anapog).
Budiongan
and Trabajo were also found by the Ombudsman to have
"actually intervened or took part in their official
capacity" in the approval, implementation and release
of funds for the project.
Trabajo,
the ruling cited, was identified as the supplier while
Budiongan owned the trucks that hauled the limestone.
Both
former Carmen officials "clearly showed dominant
use of influence" by securing the contract and
approving its payments from the municipal government's
funds, the Ombudsman resolution stated.
|
Moreover,
the Ombudsman found that Trabajo only delivered 1,000 cubic
meters of limestone, short of the 501 loads which was paid
by the municipal government for P75,150 as evidenced by a
disbursement voucher.
"There
is therefore, sufficient evidence to warrant a finding of
probable cause to hold respondents for violation of Sec. 3
(h) of RA 3019 known as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices
Act," the ruling said.
Sec.
3 (h) of RA 3019 prohibits a public officer from "directly
or indirectly having a financial or pecuniary interest in
any business, contract or transaction in connection with which
he intervenes or takes part in his official capacity
"
Likewise,
the Ombudsman noted that Trabajo obtained the limestone without
any extraction permit granted by the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (DENR).
While
he claimed to have secured a special permit, Trabajo was not
able to present a copy of the same.
Trabajo's
quarry also encroached on a property owned by one Relaido
Jamonil who was paid by the former vice mayor for damages
in the amount of P40,000.
It
was also uncovered that aside from securing the contract to
supply limestone even without quarry permit, the former vice
mayor (Trabajo) also used the heavy equipment of the municipality
as well as its personnel. He likewise rented the truck of
the business establishment owned by the mayor (Budiongan)
to haul the limestone.
Trabajo
alleged in his counter-affidavit that he was granted a special
permit from the provincial government to extract not more
than 1,000 cubic meters of quarry materials for the period
of September 21, 2001 to November 24, 2001 to supply limestone
for the maintenance project of El Progresso Highway contracted
by the DPWH and P.T. Contractors.
However,
it was found out that while the limestone was already extracted,
the contractor decided to get limestone from another source
so that the 1,000 cu.m. anapog which was quarried for the
El Progresso project was unsold and undelivered for the purpose
which it was originally intended.
"The
more it shows that precisely he (Trabajo) uses influence to
secure the contract to supply anapog so that his alleged unsold
anapog will be sold plus the newly quarried limestone including
that which was extracted from the encroached land of Jamonil,"
the resolution stated.
Apprehension
and impounding receipts were also found to have been issued
by the Office of the Governor dated July 3, 2003 for violation
of Provincial Ordinance 93-002, DENR Administrative Order
96-40 and RA 7942 against three trucks owned by Budiongan
that were carrying limestone with no extraction permit and
delivery receipts.
Moreover,
the Ombudsman said that the quarry area is within a Watershed
Forest Reserve which is "not an alienable and disposable
property, it remains to be the property of the government
and so the government should not have spent money to buy limestone
materials extracted from government property and on which
the vice mayor (Trabajo) has no permit to quarry."
|