|
At the moment,
we have a raging controversy over our rice supply. Different, occasionally enlightening
views are aired. As a result we get to know more about the intricate business
of our rice and food supply. This,
I think, is good for all of us. It's part of our continuing education about our
social and political life. Discussions like this facilitate our sense of solidarity
as a people. Let's try to keep it that way. My
prayer is that the discussion be kept at the high level of dialogue, especially
in terms of range, content and quality. As much as possible, we should avoid partisan
politicking, which usually distorts the issue, dragging it to the gutter.
The
media should be particularly sensitive to this need. People are already developing
a keen sense of discerning what truly has a bearing on the matter and what is
extraneous to it, what is spin and what is reality. They
now can easily distinguish between chaff and grain. They can smell a rat from
a distance, seeing through the hidden agendas and ulterior motives. More importantly,
they know who they are. Those
who have something to say about the issue should purify their intention, and organize
and express their position well. They should intervene for the sole purpose of
helping solve the problem, and not just to score "pogi" points.
Thus,
they should study their opinions thoroughly, verifying their data, checking their
theories and hypotheses, and being open to other views. They should always be
courteous and cordial in the discussion. In
short, please, let's do away with reckless commentaries and shooting from the
hip. Let's tone down our emotions and inflammatory language. Let's hear all sides
calmly. Politicians
and media people should submit themselves to a high standard of discretion and
sobriety when expressing their views. They should avoid sowing intrigues and witch-hunting.
There
obviously can be persons, offices, social practices, etc. that can be blamed for
something. Let's go easy on this, refusing to get stuck there. We should always
be constructive in our approach, convinced that solving problems is more important
and urgent than blaming some people. That's
why it saddened me to note that in all this exciting discussion about the rice
issue, a nasty topic was made to cash in on it. I'm referring to the attempt to
link our rice problem with our supposed overpopulation. It's
true that everyone is free to bring out anything for all of us to consider and
discuss. It's just that with all our exchanges through the years, we should already
know what are the real issues and what are mere myths. Blaming
our population level for our rice shortage is painfully an uncalled for, anachronistic
tearing of one's hair. Like, hello, this kind of thinking has been debunked ages
ago. This
is the classic Malthusian fear whose proper place is the museum or the history
books of fascinating but failed theories and fallacies. Are we to be told again
that we should have a so-called optimum family size, say, of two or four children
only? And
that to achieve this population level, we can use any means, mouthing again the
mantra of freedom of choice that justifies the use of clearly immoral means of
family planning and population control? This
is what the persistent advocates of population-control-at-all-costs are still
doing. In
our Congress today, there are pending bills meant to legalize immoral means of
family planning, sugar-coating them as part of reproductive health. The
sponsors of these bills, who have no qualms both in presenting themselves as devout
Catholics and in violating Church teachings, even have the gall to pontificate
on what is now the moral way to tackle our supposed population problem. Everyone
knows that there are problems everywhere-food, water, air, our politics, etc.
With respect to our food problem, only ideological crackpots believe it's a problem
without solution, or that the world is running out of resources to feed us.
We will
always find solutions, and solutions are fit for us, who are not just economic
entities, or purely material or social beings. That There are solutions that are
fit for us who are persons and children of God.
(E-mail: juan_mercado@boholchronicle.com) |