| (We
are trying to accommodate our e-mail senders especially those
worth to see print. So, here we are again giving way to this
piece sent by Rudan Alberto Matig-a through his given e-mail
address danmatiga@hotmail.com)
Corruption
Anyway we envision it either during Marcos time or before
Marcos time, it is the same, because since man started counting
time there was already corruption. We cannot avoid it because
government is only governed by humans. A government that is
clean and incorruptible is the government of angels.
I
think there is no need to question sympathizers, relatives,
friends or supporters who get the best position in government
whenever the politician they're supporting wins in an election
because that is normal in politics. You don't appoint your
political adversary to a very sensitive position in government,
but you have to appoint a trusted man coming from your own
political party. In the case of JFK, when he was elected president
of the US he appointed his own brother as the US Attorney-General.
The
awarding of contracts of whatever kind to the politician's
financial supporters is normal as long as it is not against
the law. There is nothing to be against it. All of these they
got it through political patronage
. Of course!
In
an ideal political election campaign each opposing political
party has its own economic
platform presented to the people. They have financial supporters
and also advisers to advice them on economic issues. Whoever
will win after the elections, political advisers especially
those who are dealing with the party's economic platform will
get the juicy position in government, like the position of
governor of the Central Bank or Secretary of Finance or BIR
commissioner or Chief in the Bureau of Custom.
Political
supporters who cannot be accommodated in government positions
will become lobbyists in the private sector. Sweet and juicy
contracts in government are always cornered by these lobbyists.
This
is where the issue of corruption emanates. Most of the times
the issues are tainted with envy. For Filipino politicians
one week is too long for the next election.
That
is how greedy they are in the pursuit of political power.
In today's political skirmish in our country oppositionists
device plans and political maneuvers to fuel the anger of
the people and oust a sitting president before his or her
term ends. The conduit of this political maneuvers is the
media. The media is the one responsible in demonizing and
spinning issues against a sitting president. The media is
the one pretending to be the voice of the people.
Filipino
intellectuals have the habit of glorifying the media as part
of our system of living in a democratic society and most of
them tend to believe and listen to the media as the voice
of truth that, whatever is written in the press can be considered
as if it is the truth in the gospel. But in a democracy the
last bulwark is a court of law. This is where the other side
of the truth is heard.
There
is a lot of difference between the US media, our model of
freedom of the press, and the press in the Philippines. In
the US, I think there is mutual respect for both parties whoever
wins the election by restraining each party and the media
in the issue of corruption. For example is Halliburton Inc.
which was chaired by Vice president Cheney
When he was
elected vice president of the US he transferred the chairmanship
of the company to his wife. Ever since G.W. Bush Jr. was elected
president of the US, Halliburton Inc. is cornering all the
government contracts in the Middle East especially in Iraq
and Afghanistan. Is the US press shouting to high heavens
of corruption between the government and Halliburton Inc.?
I think not! Are government officials not reaping commissions
from government contractors like Halliburton Inc.? Of course
they are reaping commissions. Is receiving commission a form
of corruption? The answer is
. No!
The
two Filipino presidents demonized by the Philippine press
as corrupt presidents are Erap and Marcos. They even landed
in the Guinness Book of World Records as corrupt leaders.
On records the book says that Marcos amassed a whooping 10
billion dollars during his term as president. Aside stashing
away billions of dollars Marcos also connived with Westinghouse
Inc. in a corruption scandal in the contract of the Bataan
Nuclear Power Plant or BNPP. The Cory government discovered
in Malacanang left by the Marcoses documents purportedly to
be bribe receipts worth $10 million from Westinghouse Inc..
As I've said before that; "The last bulwark of democracy
is the court of law"
So Atty. Rene Saguisag representing
the Philippine government and NAPOCOR went to Seattle to file
the case against Westinghouse Inc. of corruption and bribery.
Lawyer from Westinghouse Inc. testified that the 10 million
dollars was a commission not a bribe that even without Marcos
anybody in his government will receive that amount. Atty.
Rene Saguisag went home empty handed because the Seattle court
rendered the decision in favor of Westinghouse Inc.. The court
believes Westinghouse Inc. that it is not a bribe but a commission.
I
think there is an ocean of difference in definition of commission
earned in government contract from corruption or bribery even
in Philippine jurisprudence. I think we are only blinded by
the press not to know the right definition.
People
in our country like the students, the politicians and the
business elite, people in the academe, the Philippine bishops
and clergies, members of the media and the Filipino intellectuals
These are the people we can clearly classify with superior
intelligent minds that can influence the political thinking
of a nation
compared to the people who labored as maids,
drivers, factory workers, blue collars OFW's, farmers, fishermen,
basket and nipa weavers in the rural areas, quarrymen and
the "coconut pilot" or the tuba gatherer
These
are the people who are silent and uninfluential and they cannot
even understand the implication of a political issue yet,
I believe they comprise the majority of the Filipino people.
They are the one that holds the power through the ballot and
not those minority that formed as a mob in Edsa.
In
the constitution it is provided the people's participation.
Is this mob people power or the power of the people through
the ballot?
*
* * * *
For comments
and suggestions, just e-mail to the following e-mail addresses:
obiter@boholchronicle.com
|