|
In 2010, Benigno
Aquino, Salvador Escudero, Gilberto Teoodoro or Manuel Villar may be President.
Whoever is elected will inherit, from outgoing (hopefully) President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo,
three "inevitables": death, taxes - and nearly 92 million Filipinos.
Population-wise, we'd be 20 Singapores.
Rewind
to 1940. The census, that year, informed Preisdent Manuel Quezon: there were almost
20 million Filipinos. Quezon's successor, next year, will have five times that
pre-World War II headcount.
Fast
forward to 2016. Noynoy, Chiz, Gibo or Manny will step down from Malacanang. ("What
about me?" Asks Erap, shackled by plunder and murder charges) He will also
pass on three "inevitables": death, taxes - and probably 101.6 million
Filipinos. We'd equal eight Cambodias then.
That's
a given. Population growth has a momentum that ignores presidents, or bishops.
Not "all thy piety nor wit shall
cancel half a line," Omar Khayam
wrote.
Consider
the "youth bulge". Majority of Filipinos are young. With hormones in
overdrive, many start families early, despite marriage codes that jack up minimum
age. They tarry in reproductive years longer. Family planning services are patchy.
Other
Asian nations have completed their "demographic transition". That's
when death and birth rates drop, and population stabilizes at lower levels. Have
we even started?
The
"Asean Twins" offer a case study. Thailand and the Philippines had,
in the 1970s, almost identical demographic and economic profiles. Thailand adopted
a population policy.. We waffled.
Today,
there are almost 64 million Thais. Contrast that with 88.5 million Filipinos,
our delayed 2007 census tallied.. A bogged down demographic transition added 24.5
million Filipinos more. That's almost one Malaysia.
The
bitter debate over the Reproductive Health bills, meanwhile, continues. Ironically,
both sides agree on key points..
All
concur that the cascade of wizened ill-nourished babies, into city slums or rural
hovels, short of food, medicine, clean water, etc. is a scandal. This can not
continue. Otherwise,
we forfeit all claims to being a humane society. .
Shrill
advocates or opponents of RH bills blur the fact that government and church agree
on responsible parenthood.
The
Catholic Bishops' 2nd Plenary Council, for example, taught: Parents should "beget
only those children they can raise up in a truly human and Christian way
The
decision on number of children rests solely with parents."
"It
is legitimate for government to orient the demography of population," the
Catholic catechism says. It can do so by information, but not by coercion or "means
contrary to moral law."
All
recoil from abortion. Yet, "nearly half a million Filipinas opted for underground
abortions, in 2000," notes Dr Mary Racelis formerly of Unicef. Illegal clinics
and hilots ply their sub-rosa trade.
Are
abortions up to 700,000 today? No one really knows. But all agree women must be
helped to become informed and speak for themselves Continued neglect would "abet
the terrible reality of abortion as the only viable choice open to poor Filipino
women."
Both
sides agree that families should be educated, including natural family planning
methods. Almost a third ( 27%) of women in the poorest fifth of population want
to limit their families,
But
they lack access to information and services. These are essential if couples are
to make family size decisions responsibly and freely, . Pope John Paul II stressed.
A "bahala na" attitude spills into unplanned pregnancies and abortions
. Children are denied support to realize their God-given potentials.
Bucking
artificial contraception is not enough, says the new book: "Natural Family
Planning". Practical programs, must replace acrimony, so family needs of
people, specially the neediest, are met
The
Research Institute for Mindanao Culture and Science Foundation, .based at Xavier
University, and Philippine Center for Population and Development, drew up this
163 page study It examines experience in "frontier" Mindanao dioceses
- Ipil, Cagayan de Oro, Isabela (Basilan) Digos and Cotabato. Other "traditional"
dioceses, Capiz and Jaro among them, are analyzing the impact..
Real
life experiences in scavenger areas like Payatas or rural settings as in Ipil
are the book's anchor. This compendium is a proactive response, wrote then CBCP
president Angel Lagdaemo in the foreword. It is relevant for all diocesan "Family
and Life" commissions. .
"There
is need for pastoral prudence," Cagayan de Oro's Archbishop Antonio Ledesma
writes. But we must give an effective answer to the stark realities of unwanted
pregnancies, abortions and use of contraceptives
That (calls for ) some pastoral
innovation. Duc in altum ( "Launch into the deep")
Cagayan
has an all NFP program in key parishes. It's programs incorporate the improved
Standard Days Method, which CBCP accepts. Only parishes that volunteer may join.
No funds from government or foreign agencies are used. Contraceptives are excluded.
Ledesma
urges an "inclusive approach" by openness to government support for
NFP programs. "Some look at the risks involved," he wrote. "I look
at the hope. "
Isn't
that lifted from St. James letter of AD 50?. If you say to the needy "go
in peace, keep warm and eat well", but do not give them help, "of what
use is it? " Ask Noynoy, Chiz, Gibo or Manny..All right. Ask Erap too.
(E-mail:
juan_mercado@boholchronicle.com) |