Study
will not change scientific environ facts "Any
further environmental studies off Panglao Bay will not alter the scientific facts
and the reclamation benefits cannot compensate for the richness of Panglao Bay's
Marine Biodiversity once it is damaged."
This
was the unanimous conclusion of the six scientists who conducted a Panglao Reclamation
Scientific Conference last Thursday. Among
those who offered their time (without compensation) for the comprehensive discussion
and brainstorming using the present scientific facts based on the studies done
in Panglao Bay were Dr. Anicia | | GLOBAL
SCIENTISTS gather in Panglao town to elucidate further the need to preserve
the biodiversity in the island amid the proposal to reclaim several islets in
the seawaters off Panglao. The scientists declare that no study can change what
is scientifically real in Bohol's natural resources which need to be protected. | Q.
Hurtado, a seaweed expert from the Integrated Services for the Development of
Aquaculture and Fisheries SEAFDED Aquaculture Department, Dr. Rene N. Rollon,
a sea grass expert from the Institute of Environmental Science and Meteorology
(IESM), College of Science in UP Diliman, Dr. Danilo Largo, expert on biology
and seaweed diseases from the University of San Carlos Research Center, Dr. Lemuel
Aragones, expert in Marine Mammal Science from the IESM, UP Diliman, Dr. Wilfredo
L. Campos, expert on Plankton and Fisheries from the UP Visayas and Dr. Cesar
Villanoy, expert on Physical Oceanography from the UP Marine Science Institute.The
groups studied and integrated all the scientific data available from the previous
studies done in Panglao Bay through the recent years and the system surrounding
the area. However, their study and discussion were mainly focused on the 650 hectares
which is the actual area of the proposed site of the Oasis and Waterfront reclamation
projects. Among
the highlights of the discussion is the importance of sea grasses in the ecosystem
of the productivity of fish and other marine products.
It
had been a loud declaration of the fishermen supporting the reclamation that the
area to be reclaimed is nothing but sea grasses. These fishermen even compared
the place to be reclaimed as a mere desert. PROBABLE
IMPACT
Dr.
Rene Rollon, an expert on sea grass, explained the largely unseen huge contribution
of see grass in the production of fish and other marine species. "Fishermen
sail to the sea with only one thing in the mind which is to have a catch",
Rollon politely explained as he continued that "these fishermen of course
can't see the value of the huge area of sea grass in that place and so naturally
they don't appreciate the presence of the sea grass".
| | | But
in the eyes of an expert, Dr. Rollon took an example of the life cycle of the
siganids (danggit). He said that these siganids can't become adult without passing
in the sea grasses because the sea grass is part of their life cycle. Rollon added
that even common fish species like the "tulingan" and "tamarong"
are mostly fed by species living in beds of sea grasses. "Now
try to cover those sea grasses in the area with tonnage of soil and all of you
can be assured that the productivity of those fish will inevitably decline",
Rollon said. | Rollon
added that even the known penaeid shrimp "lukon" can't grow without
passing through the mangroves. The proposal of Waterfront clearly pictured that
mangrove will not be covered with soil. However, the tonnage of soil to be dumped
in the area can cease the normal function of the mangrove in the ecosystem as
flows of sea water can't anymore reach the shore. For
her part, Dr. Anicia Q. Hurtado, a seaweed expert, explained that the huge strip
of white sand in Panglao is due to the presence of coralline macroalge and calcareous
seaweed in the area which contributes in making the sands white. "Most
foreigners come here because of the white sand of the beaches. Their whiteness
is largely due to the presence of seaweeds in the area. Now if you cover those
seaweeds with soil, what will surely happen?" Hurtado explained. Dr.
Danilo Largo, an expert on Biology and Seaweed Diseases, who also participated
in the Panglao 2004 Marine Biodiversity Project headed by Prof. Philippe Bouchet
from the National Museum of Natural History in Paris, France, stressed about the
almost incomparable richness of the marine biodiversity of Panglao Bay as what
has been discovered by the Panglao Expedition. It
can be recalled that the 2004 Panglao Expedition, which cost around P40 million
pesos, participated in by 74 scientists, students and volunteers from 19 countries,
have announced the discovery of 1,200 decapod crustaceans or different species
of crabs and shrimps, and around six thousand mollusk species, all not known to
science before the expedition. Dr.
Largo pointed out that unless proven otherwise, those new species being recorded
into science and mostly found in Bohol, are in danger of being wiped out of the
world if reclamation will be pushed through. "Again
you will lose the very products that you've been selling to the tourists as they
come here", Dr. Largo stressed.
A
recent study conducted in the Bohol Sea by the Philippine Strait Dynamic Experiment
from 2007-2009 had discovered the Bohol Jet. Bohol Jet is a constant strong current
of sea water passing in the Bohol Sea from Surigao Strait to the Sulu Sea via
Dipolog Strait. Panglao Island lies on the northern edge of the westward flowing
Bohol Jet. The persistent nature of this jet flow, as revealed by ocean measurements
and satellite remote sensing, suggests that the net larval transport may also
be westward and that Panglao may be an important larval source for reefs in western
Bohol Sea. These physical features, scientists say, have been shown in other areas
to positively influence larval entrainment and supply.
The
group also believed that even the migratory species such as mammals will be affected.
Studies show that there is a strong link between fisheries and dolphins. It appears
that, with the Bohol Jet, Panglao Bay and its immediate vicinity is an entrainment
(larval deposition) area. Therefore, any disturbance of the sea current through
tonnage of soil covering vast area has serious implication to the coastal fisheries.
In effect, dolphins would then have problems with food source. Studies
further found out that Bohol Sea has one of the most diverse assemblages of dolphins,
toothed whales and baleen whales in the country. The
group found out that reclamation can damage the very products that are sold by
Bohol to the tourists. These products are unique and mostly present in Panglao
Bay. In
the end, it would still be a question of sustainability of living over protecting
Marine Biodiversity, or converting it into commercial and entertainment that the
reclamation project proposes to do. GENERAL
CONCLUSION
The
group carved conclusions based on the foregoing probable impacts. They believed
that the direct loss of at least 500 hectares of dense sea grass beds (with an
equivalent of minimum annual production of US$9.5 million intrinsic value) and
indirectly destroying the entire mangrove-seagrass-seaweed-coral ecosystem (2,300
hectares in total) in Panglao Bay due to reclamation is not environmentally sound.
Their
conclusion continued that with the Bohol Jet, Panglao Bay appears to be an entertainment
area (larval retention; emphasizing the nursery function of sea grasses and mangroves
in the area) and that there is broader geographic (multi-province) implication
with respect to (1) the disruption of the larval/plankton connectivity, (2) supply
of white sand to beaches downstream of Bohol Jet, and (3) coastal fisheries.
The
group believed that any further environmental study, as what is pushed by the
OASIS, will not change the scientific facts that have been established along Panglao
Bay.
The
group is willing to grace any invitation from the Sangguniang Panlalawigan for
future committee hearings.
For
her part, 3rd District Board Member Godofreda Tirol, who was also present during
the conference together with Board Member Romulo Cepedoza, expressed thanks for
the time and efforts of the scientists who somehow open the intelligence of ordinary
people especially on the importance of sea grass on the life cycle of coastal
fish.
David
Bailley, president of the Panglao Association of Nature Advocates, who organized
the forum, called on the Boholanos to do their part in educating the people behind
the dangers in pushing for any reclamation in Panglao Bay. (Anthony R. Aniscal)
|