Under
normal conditions, the Philippine Army, Navy and Air Force are to fight external
enemy attacks against national territory. The Philippine National Police (PNP),
on the other hand, was designed to maintain local peace and order and crush criminality
at the community level.
In
the post World War II episode (in the absence of an external aggressor like Japan),
the security of the State was largely challenged by the armed uprising of the
Hukbalahap movement, which is now a close caricature of the current armed dissident
group, the New People's Army (NPA). The Philippine Army (military) had waged this
fratricidal war against the dissident movement which has resulted in about 60,000
deaths over a long 37-year period and counting.
The
Police took care of maintaining law and order at the local level.
Lately,
however, there has been a move from top military brass to transfer the arduous
task of containing rebellion to the PNP - out of the hands of the military. In
a resolution No 2006-2009 made last Friday, the Bohol Provincial Peace and Order
Council (PPOC) appealed to National Defense Secretary Avelino Cruz and DILG Secretary
Avelino Cruz and DILG Secretary Ronaldo V. Puno to give the motion a serious second
thought.
PNP
Provincial Director Arturo Evangelista himself has admitted the incapability of
the police to handle the insurgency problem at the moment. Why indeed reinvent
the wheel - when the military through the 302nd Brigade had successfully caused
the rebel group to move out to the Eastern Visayas.
Late
last year while the Chronicle visited the San Juanico bridge (Leyte side), we
heard sporadic gunfire from the Samar side, confirming the rumor that the rebels
had shifted gears from Bohol for somewhere else.
We
recall that after former Negros Occidental Governor Bitay Lacson threw fire and
brimstone at the NPAs in the 80s, the rebels scrambled to Cebu and Bohol - where
indeed various encounters ensued between them and the military. We recall a provincial
commander and his troops were ambushed and in 2004 no less than the Governor Erico
Aumentado was fired upon near the Capitol building at the height of the electoral
campaign by suspected armed partisans. They had gone that bold.
The
rebels' partial exit doesn't still justify that the onus of the anti-insurgency
fall on the shoulders of the police, simply because the military has "superior
experience and capability on internal security concerns" per the PNP.
We
couldn't have agreed more.
Over
the 37 years of fighting the rebel groups, the military re-assigned from other
areas of conflict, are also trained in doing engineering work and social contract
chores as part of winning the hearts of the people at large. The PNP is not largely
exposed to that. Nor are they trained to fight in rugged, treacherous terrains
over mountains, rivers and caves nor are they exposed to that kind of combat preparedness
associated with semi full-scale battle.
The
PNP is prepared to take on common and petty criminals but may be fazed by the
ferocity of armed and dangerous enemies who will die for an ideology as soon as
they wake up in the morning. They
are not trained in the kind of psychological warfare that is necessary to fight
dissidents with a cause. They need the warrior psychology of the military that
sometimes sleeps and wakes up to the sound of gunfire from near their hiding place.
The
PNP has to be trained and experienced in real war to be at par with the aggressive
forms of fighting that the rebels are used to. They are not yet there - and it
will take years of experience - hands on, to arrive at the level.
There
is a need for a transition period where the convergence strategy is of the PNP
and the local officials supporting the military acting as lead agent. The allocation
of the P1-Billion "Crush the Insurgency" where P300-Million goes to
the PNP and P400-Million to the Military, undercores the fact that perhaps that
direction we are recommending is now being taken.
Be
that as it may - superior arms and training do not a winner of the rebel war make.
The United States in all its power and might could not conquer Vietnam guerillas
who frustrated the Americans' bid to subdue the Asian state.
The
war of attrition against the violent enemies of the State is not won by guns and
bullets alone. It is won by livelihood and providing food on the table, equal
justice for all and a kind of governance that is pro-people and not corrupted
to enrich those in power and their private sector collaborators.
Be
that as it may, it seems ill-advised to us at this point to change horses, so
to speak, when the river is raging fast and furious, midstream.
In
the meantime, the military must tackle the insurgency and the police handle criminal
matters and ensure public order and safety of communities. To do otherwise is
an experiment of folly and risk. |