After
20 years of legal struggle, the PCGG (Philippine Commission on Good Government),
is throwing in the towel and wants to do an "amicable" compromise with
the Marcoses. The latter has been accused of plundering the nation's wealth estimated
at a whooping US$5 to US$ 10 billion.
Aside
from the 500 ill-gotten wealth cases, the compromise agreement will have to mean
the erasure of the criminal charges lodged against the Marcoses.
We
state a categorical, emphatic "No" - in disagreement to the current
direction of compromise pursued by PCGG Camilo Sabio and arrogant PCGG Commissioner
Ricardo Abcede whose name sounds like an unfinished alphabet. For five good reasons.
First,
no amount of money can buy the value of one human life. Hundreds of lives have
been lost by the brutality of the Martial Law regime of which the Marcoses were
the chief architects. Let it not be lost that this is the reason why murder convictions
do not have bail because that would monetize and dehumanize the sanctity of human
life. What about hundreds of lives?
A
Supreme Court precedent signed by the current Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban
is recorded on December 9, 1997 against the plea of PCGG then chair Magtanggol
Gunigundo (we wonder sino'ng tinatanggol niya?) for a compromise agreement with
the Marcoses stating that criminal cases cannot be subject to compromise.
Two,
this would encourage other government officials to "steal now, pay later,"
a plan that protects official theft with the protective mantel of a future legal
armor with the Marcos Deal as a convenient legal precedent. Third, it blinds our
eyes to the difference between right and wrong, since the justification is that
20 years is too long to monetize the alleged ill-gotten wealth. Theft a century
ago is still theft today -- which means owning up what is not yours. What has
20 years of unsuccessful legal battles got to do with the sense of morality?
Fourth,
it propagates the theory that it is alright to "steal big and steal plenty"
because one can always buy up the judicial system and hire smart lawyers to delay
cases while a government clerk goes to jail for stealing P30,000. Then use the
long delay in justice system to justify the compromise agreement?
Fifth,
a compromise agreement allows the suspects to cover their entire liability (civil
and criminal) with just a portion of their ill-gotten wealth, making the Filipinos
fools twice over.
Therefore,
the silly act of Commissioner Abcede of inviting the main protagonist, former
First Lady Imelda Marcos, to his 59th birthday in his new Makati condominium recently
was in absolute poor taste and invites questions. Having lost his moral alphabet,
the flamboyant commissioner says his "amicable" settlement based on
the Latin word "amicus" (friend) is meant to make the compromise a "friendly"
one.
PCGG
Chair Camilo Sabio sings a duet with Mr. Alphabet by saying that the Marcos Compromise
Deal will allow us to "put it all behind us" and "unite our people."
How we can put to rest the Guinness World record holders of plunder behind us
and how a compromise agreement will "unite a nation" put to penury and
having suffered lost lives and property, escapes even our most fertile imagination
at the moment.
Some
other entity should replace the inutile PCGG which has apparently produced many
"commissioners" instead of doing good governance of assets. Its record
of recovering wealth is atrocious and the handsome perks and salaries of PCGG
officers and directors in sequestered banks and corporations had added to the
government budget deficit through losses of government-owned corporations.
After
20 years of shameful performance, it justifies "The Big One" by toying
with the idea of a series of compromises with the Marcoses and the cronies. Meantime,
we Filipinos have allowed ourselves to be taken for a ride by the alternate asinine
claims of the Marcoses for far too long.
One
day, Imeldific cries she is so poor she had to borrow money from rich philanthropists
like Doris Duke. The next day, the Marcoses claim that a compromise deal with
them will allow the country to pay its foreign debt with the Marcos wealth.
Imelda
Marcos had always smugly claimed when confronted with the plundered wealth issue
in the past that "some people are smarter than others." When asked how
much their wealth was, Madame Butterfly quipped something like the answer of the
billionaire silver dealers (Huns): He who knows how much he is worth, ain't worth
that much.
The
Marcoses and their cronies and the PCGG officers had lived life to the hilt for
the last 20 years without any conviction of any crime committed against the Filipino
race. They probably figured these (Filipino) suckers for two decades wont be bright
enough today to figure what we are really up to. So let's have a Compromise Deal.
That's
really the biggest insult to an already large injury. Do we just stand and watch,
ladies and gentlemen?
Do
we honor now as our new heroes Sabio and Acebede as the nation's new Batman and
Robin to fight crime in the proverbial Gotham City? Alas and alack! |